2005 Cadillac DTS vs. 1986 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DTS (287 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1986 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Falcon.
Because 1986 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac DTS (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Falcon. (241 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac DTS | 1986 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DTS | Falcon |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2840 mm |