2005 Cadillac DTS vs. 1994 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Cadillac DTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac DTS (287 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1994 Opel Omega. (207 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1994 Opel Omega.
Because 1994 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac DTS (388 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Opel Omega. (270 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac DTS | 1994 Opel Omega | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | DTS | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 287 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2740 mm |