2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1963 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP) has 287 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1698 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300. 2005 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1963 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1963 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: