2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (346 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1282 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac Escalade | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | Escalade | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2527 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |
