2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1203 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Escalade | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2678 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2760 mm |
