2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1201 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Escalade | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2527 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |
