2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (346 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1705 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Renault 9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | Escalade | 9 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2527 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 38 L |
