2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1984 Lotus Etna. (331 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lotus Etna. (408 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac Escalade | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Escalade | Etna |
Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 408 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 95.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 11.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |