2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac Escalade | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | Escalade | 1700 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5966 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 36 L |