2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1992 Volvo 960
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (346 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 997 kg more than 1992 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Volvo 960. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac Escalade | 1992 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Escalade | 960 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2527 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2780 mm |
