2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (346 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac Escalade | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Escalade | FTO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
