2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2000 Chrysler Java

To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.

Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Java. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac Escalade 2000 Chrysler Java
Make Cadillac Chrysler
Model Escalade Java
Year Released 2005 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5998 cc 1397 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 345 HP 81 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Front
Vehicle Length 5630 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1930 mm 1580 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]