2005 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1332 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac Escalade | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | Escalade | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2527 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 50 L |
