2005 Cadillac SRX vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac SRX (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 756 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac SRX (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac SRX | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | SRX | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
