2005 Cadillac SRX vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac SRX. (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac SRX.
Because 2005 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac SRX. (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac SRX | 1993 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | SRX | XJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 5993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 464 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2880 mm |