2005 Cadillac SRX vs. 2002 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 454 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac SRX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac SRX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (181 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac SRX | 2002 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | SRX | Evanda |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 13.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 65 L |