2005 Cadillac SRX vs. 2003 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac SRX (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 374 kg more than 2005 Cadillac SRX.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac SRX (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac SRX 2003 Ford Econoline
Make Cadillac Ford
Model SRX Econoline
Year Released 2005 2003
Body Type SUV Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4572 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 311 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4700 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1951 kg 2325 kg
Vehicle Length 4960 mm 5390 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 2060 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 3510 mm