2005 Cadillac SRX vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (80 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 669 kg more than 2003 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac SRX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac SRX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (188 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane. 2005 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac SRX | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | SRX | Megane |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 188 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 18.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 4.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |