2005 Cadillac SRX vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MX would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MX.
Because 2005 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda MX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac SRX | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | SRX | MX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |