2005 Cadillac SRX vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac SRX would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac SRX (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac SRX (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac SRX | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | SRX | E-250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 132 L |