2005 Cadillac SRX vs. 2013 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac SRX would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (653 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac SRX. (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac SRX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 203 kg more than 2013 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (856 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 436 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac SRX. (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac SRX. 2005 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac SRX 2013 Ford Mustang
Make Cadillac Ford
Model SRX Mustang
Year Released 2005 2013
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4572 cc 5800 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 311 HP 653 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 856 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 105 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1951 kg 1748 kg
Vehicle Length 4960 mm 4778 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2035 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1438 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.2 L/100km 8.3 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 13.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 61 L