2005 Cadillac STS vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac STS (255 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 586 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac STS | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | STS | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1796 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |
