2005 Cadillac STS vs. 1976 TVR 3000
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 797 kg more than 1976 TVR 3000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1976 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1976 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac STS | 1976 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | TVR |
| Model | STS | 3000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1817 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 58 L |
