2005 Cadillac STS vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac STS (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac STS | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | STS | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3562 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2160 mm |
