2005 Cadillac STS vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac STS (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 610 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac STS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac STS | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | STS | Celica |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3562 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2640 mm |