2005 Cadillac STS vs. 1994 Mazda 626

To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 605 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac STS 1994 Mazda 626
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model STS 626
Year Released 2005 1994
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 321 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 427 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 8.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1817 kg 1212 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 60 L