2005 Cadillac STS vs. 1996 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac STS (255 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1996 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1996 Jaguar XJS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1996 Jaguar XJS has manual transmission. 1996 Jaguar XJS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac STS | 1996 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | STS | XJS |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 3978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 82 L |