2005 Cadillac STS vs. 1999 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Commander would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Commander weights approximately 472 kg more than 2005 Cadillac STS.
Because 1999 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac STS | 1999 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | STS | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1796 kg | 2268 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |