2005 Cadillac STS vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2002 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2002 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 417 kg more than 2002 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 75. 2005 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2002 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2002 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac STS | 2002 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | STS | 75 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1817 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |
