2005 Cadillac STS vs. 2002 Volvo S60

To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,562 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac STS. (252 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac STS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 219 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60.

Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac STS. (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac STS. 2005 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2002 Volvo S60 has manual transmission. 2002 Volvo S60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Cadillac STS 2002 Volvo S60
Make Cadillac Volvo
Model STS S60
Year Released 2005 2002
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3562 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 252 HP 295 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 342 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 1950 RPM
Engine Bore Size 94 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 93.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1571 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]