2005 Cadillac STS vs. 2003 Fiat Idea
To start off, 2005 Cadillac STS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Fiat Idea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Fiat Idea would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac STS (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Idea. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Idea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 596 kg more than 2003 Fiat Idea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Fiat Idea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac STS (339 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Idea. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Idea. 2005 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2003 Fiat Idea has manual transmission. 2003 Fiat Idea will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac STS | 2003 Fiat Idea | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | STS | Idea |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 159 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.4 seconds | 15.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1796 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |