2005 Cadillac STS vs. 2012 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac STS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac STS weights approximately 710 kg more than 2012 Citroen C-Zero.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac STS | 2012 Citroen C-Zero | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | STS | C-Zero |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2550 mm |