2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 724 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac XLR | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | XLR | Cedric |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4564 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |