2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1962 Steyr 650T

To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 1154 kg more than 1962 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 650T. 2005 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1962 Steyr 650T has manual transmission. 1962 Steyr 650T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: