2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1972 Mazda 818
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 655 kg more than 1972 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac XLR (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac XLR | 1972 Mazda 818 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | XLR | 818 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2320 mm |