2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 834 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac XLR | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | XLR | 66 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4564 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1390 mm |
