2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac XLR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac XLR | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | XLR | 4000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4564 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86.4 mm |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2550 mm |