2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 280 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac XLR | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | XLR | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4564 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1850 mm |
