2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1997 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan El Grand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan El Grand would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 316 kg more than 2005 Cadillac XLR.
Because 2005 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1997 Nissan El Grand has manual transmission. 1997 Nissan El Grand will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac XLR | 1997 Nissan El Grand | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | XLR | El Grand |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
| Engine Size | 4564 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1950 mm |
