2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 4,564 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac XLR (322 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 251 kg more than 2005 Cadillac XLR.
Because 2005 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Cadillac XLR | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | XLR | SUW |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4564 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1654 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 74 L |