2005 Cadillac XLR vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2005 Cadillac XLR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 180 kg more than 2005 Cadillac XLR.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac XLR (400 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan MM. (372 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan MM.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Cadillac XLR | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | XLR | MM |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 106 L |
