2005 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Century would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1982 Buick Century. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Century.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Buick Century. (197 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Astro | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Chevrolet | Buick |
Model | Astro | Century |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 197 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2662 mm |