2005 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche would be higher. At 5,325 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche (295 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche (447 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan Hardbody has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan Hardbody will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Avalanche | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5325 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 90 L |