2005 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche. (295 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 112 kg more than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (500 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche. (447 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Avalanche | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5325 cc | 5652 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 500 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2467 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 78 L |