2005 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche would be higher. At 5,325 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche (295 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-9. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 540 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche (447 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Avalanche | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Avalanche | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5325 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2467 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 76 L |