2005 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1978 TVR 3000
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 37 kg more than 1978 TVR 3000.
Because 1978 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Aveo | 1978 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | TVR |
| Model | Aveo | 3000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1604 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1063 kg | 1026 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 58 L |
