2005 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo (83 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 50 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Aveo (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Aveo | 1980 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Aveo | Lynx |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2400 mm |