2005 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Aveo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 407 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo. (146 Nm). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Aveo | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Aveo | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1073 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.7 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |
