2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 932 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 1963 NSU 1000 C | |
Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
Model | Blazer | 1000 C |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4292 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 39 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 69 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 66.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 7.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 44 L |