2005 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (191 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 887 kg more than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Reliant |
| Model | Blazer | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 797 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 38 L |
